Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv03135
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Elsayed et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv10566
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NYPD Officer Chenise Brodie and NYPD Officers John and Jane Doe # 1, 2, 3, etc.
Plaintiff:
Laila Ibrahim and Gehad Elsayed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livermore v. Tonhofer et al
as 4:2018cv05075
Plaintiff:
Glen A Livermore
Defendant:
Debra Tonhofer, John Smith, Robert Herzog and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TENNYSON v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS et al
as 4:2018cv00119
Plaintiff:
MARK TENNYSON
Defendant:
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS and JOHN and JANE DOES 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herman Rene Ontiveros et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2018cv00101
Defendant:
Debbie Asuncion, Debbie Asuncion, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Rene Ontiveros
Williams v. Shebel et al
as 1:2018cv00029
Plaintiff:
D'Aaron Williams
Defendant:
Susan Shebel, John Doe 1, Gachev and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2017cv01072
Defendant:
Snohomish County , Denny Juvenile Justice Center , Marilyn Finsen and others
Plaintiff:
Shane S Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2017cv01071
Defendant:
Snohomish County , TIM ODELL , Marilyn Finsen and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe Finsen and Shane S Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Batista v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2017cv04245
Plaintiff:
Raul Batista
Defendant:
City of New York, Alfred Santeriso, James Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
