Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Perez et al v. Fog River et al
as 2:2015cv00500
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Fog River and John Bowen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv06047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowen v. City of Saint Paul et al
as 0:2013cv03042
Plaintiff:
John Bowen, Jr
Defendant:
City of Saint Paul and Saint Paul Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeCroy et al v. Wilbros, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Ray LeCroy , Diane LeCroy , Catherine Addison and others
Defendant:
Wilbros, LLC , Environmental Concepts, LLC , Wilcorp, Inc. and others
BMO Harris Bank, N.A. v. South Winnebago Partners, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv02319
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
South Winnebago Partners, LLC , John Bowen and Matthew J. Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
United States of America v. Joyner (Raymond A. Collins)
as 13-1762
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Archie Joyner, AKA Arch, AKA Blackie, AKA Boo, AKA Papa, Tracey Smith, Karin Jackson, AKA Karin Shuford and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Raymond A. Collins, AKA Ray, AKA Ron Turner
Bowen v. Shuttle Pizza, Inc
as 6:2013cv00173
Plaintiff:
John Bowen
Defendant:
Shuttle Pizza, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Fredrick Davis v. State of Missouri, et al
as 10-2900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fredrick James Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Missouri, Governor Nixon, Boonville Correctional Center and others
Davis v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2010cv01332
Plaintiff:
Fredrick James Davis
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Governor Nixon, Boonville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. St. Paul Police Department et al
as 0:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
John Bowen
Defendant:
St. Paul Police Department and St. Paul, City of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
