Cases 21 - 30 of 31,289
Cannon v. Danforth et al
as 5:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Cannon
Defendant:
William Danforth and Paul Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OROZCO v. ELI TIMBERLAND TREE SERVICE LLC et al
as 2:2024cv07045
Plaintiff:
JUAN OROZCO
Defendant:
ELI TIMBERLAND TREE SERVICE LLC and ELI SANIDI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Morales et al v. Kusmenko Kustom Farming et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Lara Morales and Oscar Gerardo Cuellar Sandoval
Defendant:
Kusmenko Kustom Farming and Jason Kusmenko
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tiburcio v. ADAMS
as 5:2024cv02617
Petitioner:
Juan Tiburcio
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MELINDA ADAMS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Juan Roman Ramos v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv04738
Petitioner:
Juan Roman Ramos
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
In re: Naturalization Ceremony 06/25/2024
as 3:2024mc80145
Not Yet Classified:
Leonardo Mir Norouzi, Luis Alberto Angeles, Humberto Topete and others
(PC) Sanchez v. Banner Lassen Medical Center
as 2:2024cv01681
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Sanchez
Defendant:
Banner Lassen Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juan-Esteban v. Garland
as 24-3690
Petitioner:
MARCOS JUAN-ESTEBAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
