Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Bowen v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2010cv02108
Plaintiff:
James C Bowen
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Norris v. TitleMax of South Carolina Inc et al
as 4:2010cv00009
Plaintiff:
Christy Diane Norris
Defendant:
TitleMax of South Carolina Inc, TitleMax of South Carolina Inc, TitleMax of South Carolina Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
Norris v. TitleMax of South Carolina Inc et al
as 8:2009cv02726
Plaintiff:
Christy Diane Norris
Defendant:
TitleMax of South Carolina Inc, TitleMax of South Carolina Inc, TitleMax of South Carolina Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
Bowen v. Moya et al
as 1:2009cv00080
Plaintiff:
James Robert Bowen
Defendant:
NFN Moya, NFN Alexander and NFN Rowlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Moya et al
as 3:2009cv00892
Plaintiff:
James Robert Bowen
Defendant:
NFN Moya, NFN Alexander and NFN Rowlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. First Trust Advisors L.P. et al
as 1:2008cv05378
Plaintiff:
Morgan J. Evans and Morgan J. Evans
Defendant:
First Trust Advisors L.P., Valhalla Capital Partners, LLC, Hilliard Lyons Asset Management and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BOWEN v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv71067
Plaintiff:
JAMES M BOWEN
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ABNER et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66364
Plaintiff:
ALFONZO ABNER, CLAUDIA ABNER, VICTORIA M. ADAMS and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
