Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Bulldog Investors LLP et al v. First Trust Advisors L.P. et al
as 1:2023cv11034
Plaintiff:
Bulldog Investors LLP, Special Opportunities Fund, Inc. and High Income Securities Fund
Defendant:
First Trust Advisors L.P., James A. Bowen, Richard E. Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Byrd v. Cisco et al
as 8:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Ivey Nicole Byrd
Defendant:
Lt Cisco, Sgt Capps, Judge Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
USA v. James Bowen
as 20-1865
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES E. BOWEN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bowen v. Ladoucer
as 4:2019cv40117
Respondent:
Kristie J. Ladoucer
Petitioner:
James M Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lindsay Cooper, et al v. Tokyo Electric Power Company,, et al
as 19-55295
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS J. FELLER, ROBERT LEHRMAN, JAMES TRICE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC., AKA TEPCO, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, DOES, 1-200, inclusive and others
Redding v. Rogers et al
as 2:2017cv00367
Plaintiff:
Amanda Leigh Redding
Defendant:
Zane Edward Rogers and James Forrest Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowen v. Synchrony Bank
as 3:2016cv00523
Plaintiff:
James P. Bowen, IV
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Lindsay Cooper, et al v. Tokyo Electric Power Co.
as 15-56424
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LINDSAY R. COOPER, JAMES R. SUTTON, KIM GIESEKING and others
Defendant - Appellant:
TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC., AKA TEPCO
Real Party In Interest:
SOLICITOR GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
WILLIAM J. FALLON, Admiral, THOMAS B. FARGO, Admiral, GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN and others
Blow et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00232
Plaintiff:
Shirlynn Blow , Richard Blow , Elverett Hall and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
