Cases 21 - 30 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1322 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Carr v. Herrington
as 3:2020cv05794
Plaintiff:
Peter James Carr
Defendant:
Ryan Herrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv65337
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv01934
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JAMES CARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstead v. Haynes et al
as 3:2020cv05327
Defendant:
Kendra Wakefield, Annice Mizin, Robert Herzog and others
Plaintiff:
Wendell M Armstead, Jr, Casey Woodson, Justin T Dull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Bates, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 19-17094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE LEWELLING, JOHNSON MANDAZ, JOHNNY O. SANCHEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Former Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, CARL WOFFORD, Warden, Avenal State Prison, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Former Governer of the State of California and others
Carr v. Ferguson et al
as 2:2019cv01450
Defendant:
Stephen Sinclair, Risa Woo, Kecia Rongen and others
Plaintiff:
Peter James Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Potter v. James Green
as 19-5407
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES DAVID GREEN, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES CARR POTTER
Carr
as 2:2019cv04395
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer HealthCare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
