Cases 21 - 30 of 53
KERWIN v. PARX CASINO et al
as 5:2017cv05582
Plaintiff:
RYAN KERWIN
Defendant:
PARX CASINO , GREENWOOD GAMING & ENTERTAINMENT LLC , HELMUT PERZI and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hines, Jr. v. Riverwalk Marketplace New Orleans, LLC, et al
as 2:2017cv06741
Plaintiff:
James Hines, Jr
Defendant:
Riverwalk Marketplace New Orleans, LLC , Kone Inc. , Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hines v. Carter
as 3:2017cv00388
Plaintiff:
James Hines
Defendant:
Robert Carter, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Murray v. Jean Toal, et al
as 17-1453
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MURRAY, a/k/a James Hines
Defendant - Appellee:
JEAN HOEFER TOAL, Chief Justice of the South Carolina Supreme Court, COSTA M. PLEICONES, Associate Justice of the South Carolina Supreme Court, BARBARA B. SAUNDERS, Assistant Ethic Counsel, Virginia State Bar and others
Hines v. Superintendent
as 3:2016cv00822
Petitioner:
James Hines
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hines III v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv04306
Plaintiff:
James Hines III
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Vega et al v. RiceCo, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv02593
Plaintiff:
Rafael Vega and Marilyn Ramos
Defendant:
RiceCo, LLC, RiceCo International, Inc., United Phosphorus, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
James Murray v. Zachary Shemtob
as 16-7038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James M. Murray, also known as James Hines
Defendant - Appellee:
Zachary Baron Shemtob
James Murray v. Warden Lewisburg USP
as 15-1593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MURRAY, a/k/a James Hines
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Dowd et al v. Sisolak et al
as 2:2015cv00136
Plaintiff:
Daniel Alires, Austin Dowd, Travis Field and others
Defendant:
Board Of County Commissioners, Susan Brager, Larry Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
