Cases 21 - 30 of 188
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv31459
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUBER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv22943
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY WILLIAM HUBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. USA
as 21-20255
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeffrey Williams
Marco Amaral v. City of San Diego, et al
as 21-55420
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO and JEFFREY WILLIAMS, previously sued as FNU Williams, an individual
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCO AMARAL
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv16612
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00308
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Padgett v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00016
Defendant:
Arnaldo Mercado, Mary Cooks, Christy Vincent and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Keith Padgett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padgett v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv01021
Defendant:
Arnaldo Mercado, Mary Cooks, Christy Vincent and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Keith Padgett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KINGSBURY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv09473
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY WILLIAM KINGSBURY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. Becton, Dickinson and Company et al
as 1:2020cv04670
Defendant:
Samarat Khichi, Ronald Pasdon, Becton, Dickinson and Company and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Dauphin and Lisa D. Miller, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
