Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Higgins v. City of Melrose et al
as 1:2019cv11557
Defendant:
Stephen's Auto Body and Towing Service and City of Melrose
Plaintiff:
John T Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Higgins v. Peabody Properties
as 1:2019cv11319
Plaintiff:
John T. Higgins
Defendant:
Peabody Properties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
John Higgins, et al v. Kentucky Sports Radio, LLC, et al
as 19-5409
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW H. JONES, KENTUCKY SPORTS RADIO, LLC and DREW FRANKLIN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WEATHERGUARD, INC., CAROL HIGGINS, JOHN S. HIGGINS, JR. and others
Higgins v. Federal Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n
as 19-1069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN T. HIGGINS
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Higgins v. City of Melrose, MA et al
as 1:2019cv10015
Plaintiff:
John T. Higgins
Defendant:
City of Melrose, MA and Stephen's Auto Body & Towing Svc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Higgins v. City of Melrose et al
as 1:2018cv12605
Defendant:
Stephen Long Muir, Stephen's Auto Body and Towing Service, City of Melrose and others
Plaintiff:
John T. Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Higgins v. Verizon of New England, Inc.
as 1:2018cv12092
Defendant:
Verizon of New England, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John T Higgins
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
5 Star Life Insurance Company v. Higgins et al
as 2:2018cv00280
Plaintiff:
5 Star Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Michelle L. Higgins, Ronald C. Higgins, John J. Higgins, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
HIGGINS v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00801
Plaintiff:
JOHN LLOYD HIGGINS, JR
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Higgins v. Commonwealth of Masachusetts
as 1:2018cv10601
Plaintiff:
John T Higgins
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Masachusetts
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
