Cases 21 - 30 of 43
USA v. John Schultz
as 17-2121
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN SCHULTZ
Schultz v. Depuy Orthoraedics, Inc, et al
as 1:2016dp20204
Plaintiff:
John Schultz
Defendant:
Depuy Orthoraedics, Inc, DePuy Inc., DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grant, James v. Schultz, John et al
as 3:2016cv00655
Plaintiff:
James Edward Grant
Defendant:
John Schultz and Urban Land Interest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Grant, James v. Schultz, John et al
as 3:2016cv00654
Plaintiff:
James Edward Grant
Defendant:
John Schultz, Matthew Darga and Urban Land Interest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Schultz et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06040
Plaintiff:
Lisa Schultz and John Schultz
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schultz v. Colvin
as 2:2015at00516
Plaintiff:
Michael John Schultz
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Schultz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2015cv00933
Plaintiff:
Michael John Schultz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Coastal Research Group and its wholly owned subsidiary, The Student Doctor Network v. Student Mentor Network, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00336
Plaintiff:
Coastal Research Group and its wholly owned subsidiary, The Student Doctor Network
Defendant:
Student Mentor Network, LLC and John Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coastal Research Group and The Student Doctor Network v. The Student Mentor Network, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00334
Plaintiff:
Coastal Research Group and The Student Doctor Network
Defendant:
The Student Mentor Network, LLC and John Schultz
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Parsons v. Marmarinos et al
as 1:2014cv01122
Defendant:
Officer Darin L. Bayles, Officer Martin A. Flores, Officer B. R. Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Parsons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
