Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Quinones v. Outlaw et al
as 2:2011cv00149
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Quinones
Defendant:
T C Outlaw, Jill Dube-Gilley, G Maldonado, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Mora v. Suhasini Shah
as 11-6701
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MORA
Defendant - Appellee:
SUHASINI SHAH, Doctor, NANCY PENDERGRASS, Bureau of Prisons Petersburg Medium Dietician, M. DUPREE and others
Echevarria-De-Pena v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv01388
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons, Jorge L. Pastrana and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Echevarria-De-Pena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv14047
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00099
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Collmar v. Pastrana et al
as 8:2010cv02911
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Collmar
Defendant:
Jorge L. Pastrana, Dr. Cotton, FNU Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collmar v. Pastrana et al
as 5:2010cv00695
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Collmar
Defendant:
Jorge L. Pastrana, Dr. Cotton, FNU Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Escobar-Pacheco v. Pastrana
as 5:2010hc02187
Petitioner:
Jose William Escobar-Pacheco
Respondent:
Jorge L. Pastrana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jeremy Carter v. Jorge Pastrana, et al
as 10-13488
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY M. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JORGE L. PASTRANA, Warden, FCC Coleman Medium, DR. ONUGHA, Dentist, FCC Coleman Medium, KIM CAREY, Dental Assistant, FCC Coleman Medium and others
Jeremy Carter v. Jorge Pastrana
as 10-13487
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY M. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JORGE L. PASTRANA, Warden, FCC Coleman Medium, DR. ONUGHA, KIM CAREY, Dental Assistant, FCC Coleman Medium and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
