Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Joshua Howard v. Nikki Kamphuis, et al
as 16-3706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
NIKKI KAMPHUIS, ADA Coordinator, Waupun Correctional Institution, JASON WENZEL, Lieutenant, SUSAN MCNUTT, Sergeant and others
Joshua Howard, et al v. William Pollard, et al
as 15-8025
Petitioner:
JOSHUA HOWARD, WILLIAM E. WESO, JARVIS DUKE and others
Respondent:
WILLIAM POLLARD, SCOTT WALKER, EDWARD WALL and others
Howard et al v. Walker et al
as 2:2015cv00557
Plaintiff:
Joshua Howard, William E Weso, Adam Yeoman and others
Defendant:
Scott Walker, Edward Wall, James Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elzinga v. Aldrich et al
as 1:2015cv10808
Defendant:
Donald Aldrich, Brian Ritchey, Keath Bartynski and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Howard Elzinga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Joyce Meyer Ministries et al
as 2:2014cv01464
Plaintiff:
Joshua Howard
Defendant:
Joyce Meyer Ministries, Nevin Webster , Francis Paliekara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Kamphuis et al
as 2:2014cv01364
Plaintiff:
Joshua Howard
Defendant:
Nikki Kamphuis, Belinda Schrubbe, Jason Wenzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Schrubbe et al
as 2:2014cv01157
Plaintiff:
Joshua Howard
Defendant:
Belinda Schrubbe , Dr Reinen and Dr Schettle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Koeller et al
as 2:2014cv00667
Plaintiff:
Joshua Howard
Defendant:
Nevin Webster , Linda Koeller, William Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS et al v. MCCRORY et al
as 1:2013cv00949
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARRIS , CHRISTINE BOWSER and SAMUEL LOVE
Defendant:
PATRICK MCCRORY, NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and JOSHUA HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Pollard
as 2:2013cv00758
Petitioner:
Joshua Howard
Respondent:
William Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
