Cases 21 - 30 of 175
Parker v. Jackson et al
as 3:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
Atiba Parker
Defendant:
Kevin Jackson and Alicia Borp
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
USA v. Kevin Jackson
as 22-12144
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN JACKSON
Jackson v. Stork et al
as 3:2022cv00772
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jackson
Defendant:
Viktoriya Stork and Jean Caplan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2022cv01630
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JACKSON, ANTHONY CASALE, DANO TOKLEY and others
Defendant:
PHILIP D. MURPHY, MARCUS O. HICKS, VICTORIA L. KUHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jackson
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Friar v. Jackson et al
as 2:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Friar
Defendant:
Kevin Jackson, Jeff Darcy, J. Stark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Jackson et al
as 3:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Donnell L. Hill
Defendant:
Director of Records Kevin Jackson and Records Clerk Catina Myers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmack v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01887
Plaintiff:
Joshua Carmack
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Kevin Jackson, Theron Rumsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spillers v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01886
Plaintiff:
Danny Spillers
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Kevin Jackson, Theron Rumsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
