Cases 21 - 30 of 381
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2022cv02758
Petitioner:
Kevin Jones and Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, NFN Bowers, NFN Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Steven Smith
Defendant:
Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia, Richard Roundtree, Deputy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Bowers
as 22-11096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
R. Bowers, Mr., Senior Warden, J. Rodriguez, Ms., Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and others
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv01926
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. Bowers et al
as 3:2022cv02286
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
R Bowers, J Rodriguez, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winn v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
James L. Winn
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree, Sheriff Deputy Zachary Cuonzo-Simmons, Sheriff Deputy Brandon Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Simmons
as 22-10901
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
NFN Simmons, Captain, NFN Ward, Captain, D. Wonders and others
Kevin Jones v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-13158
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
