Cases 21 - 30 of 6,715
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rickey Benson v. Kirk Fields
as 24-5408
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
CHIEF JAILOR KIRK FIELDS, and Subordinates
Rickey Benson v. Floyd Bonner, Jr., et al
as 24-5410
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
FLOYD BONNER, JR., Shelby County Sheriff, KIRK FIELDS, Chief Jailer, SHELBY COUNTY, TN GOVERNMENT, Employed as Mayor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rickey Benson v. Kirk Fields, et al
as 24-5400
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
CHIEF JAILER KIRK FIELDS, and Subordinates
Young, Howard v. Beavais, Chad et al
as 3:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Howard Lee Young, Ebboni Young and Ebboni Howard Young
Defendant:
Lt. Chad Beavais, Lt. Paul Rosenthal, Lt. Eric Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jean-Guerrier v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Rony Jean-Guerrier
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Kirk Patrick Egan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Rickey Benson v. Kirk Fields, et al
as 24-5378
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
KIRK FIELDS, Chief Jailer, in his official capacity., DEPUTY WRIGHT, in his official capacity, SUPERVISORS OF DEPUTY WRIGHT, in official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
