Cases 21 - 30 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv30131
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson et al v. Reeves et al(MAG+)
as 2:2020cv00379
Defendant:
Mathew S. Raiti, Randall Barr, Jason Reeves and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Kyle Johnson, Michael Everet Dennison, Jr., Brandon-Kyle Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Sullivan et al (MAG+)
as 2:2020cv00425
Defendant:
Michael T. Bunn, Kelly Barron, Russell Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Michael-Everet Dennison, Jr. and Brandon-Kyle Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv71529
Plaintiff:
KYLE JOHNSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv50469
Plaintiff:
KYLE JOHNSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2020hc02043
Petitioner:
Kyle Johnson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv56111
Plaintiff:
KYLE JOHNSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv39466
Plaintiff:
KYLE JOHNSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv39824
Plaintiff:
KYLE JOHNSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02163
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
KYLE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
