Cases 21 - 30 of 9,929
Javon Gardner v. Stephen Lane, et al
as 24-1965
Plaintiff:
Javon Henry Gardner
Defendant:
Stephen Lane, Captain, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Norton, Sgt., East Arkansas Regional Unit, S. Davis, Sgt., East Arkansas Regional Unit and others
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company et al v. Estate of Hunter Lane
as 6:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Darlene Paxson
Defendant:
Estate of Hunter Lane
Garnishee:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Paxson v. Palmateer et al
as 6:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Darlene Paxson
Defendant:
Estate of Hunter Lane
Garnishee:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Dykes v. Dutton et al
as 2:2024cv02058
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lane Dykes, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer Dutton, Officer Flippin, Detective Dalton Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hassell v. Kimbark, et al
as 24-1442
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW-LANE HASSELL
Defendant:
DEVIN AILEEN KIMBARK, CHERYL L. KIMBARK, MARK KIMBARK and others
67 Park Lane Holding Corp. v. Ramzan et al
as 2:2024cv03308
Plaintiff:
67 Park Lane Holding Corp.
Defendant:
Bibi Ramzan, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thiels v. Berger et al
as 4:2024cv01668
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thiels
Defendant:
William J. Berger, Robert L. Lane, Nora Mead Brownell and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
