Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv12769
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mullis v. Warren et al
as 1:2012cv01580
Plaintiff:
Gary DeWayne Mullis
Defendant:
Neal Warren, Lynda Coker, Maria Golick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard
as 3:2012mc00036
Petitioner:
Larry Howard
Anderson et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00231
Plaintiff:
James Anderson , Sierra Batiste , Zachary Batiste and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larry Howard v. Michigan Department of Correct
as 11-2487
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Howard v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2011cv12630
Plaintiff:
Larry Howard
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Allen, et al v. BHP Navajo Coal Company, et al
as 11-2069
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOMMICITA ALLEN, BRIAN ALLISON, DUANNE ALLISON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BHP NAVAJO COAL COMPANY and SAN JUAN COAL COMPANY
Charles Hickey, Jr., et al v. Mary Chadick, et al
as 10-4271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES HICKEY, JR., DORIS EVELYN HICKEY, LARRY HOWARD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY SUSAN CHADICK, Special Assistant for Contracting Integrity, Defense Logistics Agency, LIEUTENANT GENERAL ROBERT T. DAIL, Director, Defense Logistic Agency and DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
Howard v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP et al
as 6:2009cv01262
Plaintiff:
Larry Howard, Larry Howard, Larry Howard and others
Defendant:
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Astrazeneca LP and Does 1-40
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen v. BHP Navajo Coal Co., et al.
as 1:2009cv00692
Plaintiff:
Dommicita Allen, Brian Allison, Duane Allison and others
Defendant:
BHP Navajo Coal Company and San Juan Coal Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
