Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Ahlman v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al
as 7:2014cv00173
Plaintiff:
Gary Ahlman
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company and Lee Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ahlman v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al
as 7:2014cv00175
Plaintiff:
Gary Ahlman
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company and Lee Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ahlman v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al
as 7:2014cv00177
Plaintiff:
Gary Ahlman
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company and Lee Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ahlman v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al
as 7:2014cv00181
Plaintiff:
North Main Executive Plaza
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company , Michael R. Grantland and Lee Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis Lee Bishop v. Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
as 1:2012cv03039
Defendant:
Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Bishop
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bishop v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 5:2010cv00190
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Bishop
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Arkansas Department of Correction and Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Wise et al
as 7:2009cv02137
Petitioner:
Eddie Lee Bishop
Respondent:
David Wise and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BISHOP et al v. EMPIRE ACE INSULATION MANUFACTURING CO. et al
as 2:2009cv74522
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE BISHOP and JEAN B BISHOP
Defendant:
EMPIRE ACE INSULATION MANUFACTURING CO., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Nick Bishop v. James Yate
as 08-17169
Petitioner - Appellant:
NICK LEE BISHOP
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES
Bishop v. Terry
as 3:2008cv00071
Petitioner:
Arthur Lee Bishop
Respondent:
William Terry
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
