Cases 21 - 30 of 1,149
LITTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22081
Plaintiff:
JERRY RICHARD LITTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORRIS v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 3:2022cv17426
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LITTON MORRIS
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Litton v. City of Millersville et al
as 3:2022cv00501
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ann Marie Litton
Defendant:
City of Millersville, Eric Richards, Charlotte Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Litton v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02498
Plaintiff:
Rodney Litton
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Houlihan v. Kawas et al
as 2:2022cv00620
Plaintiff:
Thomas Houlihan
Defendant:
Leen Kawas, Ph.D., Kelly A Romano, Joseph Edelman and others
Nominal Defendant:
Athira Pharma Inc
Bushansky v. Kawas et al
as 2:2022cv00497
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Leen Kawas, Kelly A. Romano, Joseph Edelman and others
Nominal Defendant:
Athira Pharma, Inc. and Athira Pharma Inc
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Thomas Houlihan
Consolidated Defendant:
Kevin Church
Litton v. Central Kentucky Community Action Council, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Sydney Litton
Defendant:
Central Kentucky Community Action Council, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LITTON v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04726
Plaintiff:
Bobby Litton
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2022cv00495
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Leen Kawas, Kelly A. Romano, Joseph Edelman and others
Nominal Defendant:
Athira Pharma, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
