Cases 21 - 28 of 28
United States of America v. Direct Marketing Associates, Corp., et al.
as 2:2010cv00696
Defendant:
Direct Marketing Associates, Corp. and John M Rainey, Jr.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
RAINEY v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv89975
Plaintiff:
DONALD M. RAINEY and JANICE RAINEY
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION FORMERLY KNOWN AS NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RAINEY v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv89774
Plaintiff:
DONALD M. RAINEY and JANICE RAINEY
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rhodes et al v. Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv05008
Plaintiff:
Jean D. Rhodes, Jean D. Rhodes, Jean D. Rhodes and others
Defendant:
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., Hertz Investors, Inc., The Hertz Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Rainey v. Aaron Rents, Inc.
as 8:2008cv02013
Plaintiff:
Horace M. Rainey, Jr. and Horace M. Rainey, Jr.
Defendant:
Aaron Rents, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ADAMS et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2007cv66634
Plaintiff:
NATHAN W. ADAMS, LUELLA ADAMS, SAMUEL B. ALLEN and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Kline v. Ward et al
as 3:2007cv00819
Plaintiff:
Jason R. Kline
Defendant:
Jackson R. Ward and Anne M Rainey Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
