Cases 21 - 30 of 84
Cruz v. M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc.
as 3:2021cv03133
Defendant:
M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sherry Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv09609
Defendant:
Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC, The Este Lauder Companies Inc., M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tammeka Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Graham v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2020cv08876
Defendant:
Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc., THE PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY, individually and as successor in interest to YARDLEY OF LONDON, INC., LAURA MERCIER COSMETICS and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Siegmann v. M.A.C. Pizza Company, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00215
Defendant:
Bryan Dobb and M.A.C. Pizza Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Cody Siegmann
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
M.A.C. v. Gildner, et al
as 20-3105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M.A.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
MONICA GILDNER, in their individual capacity, ANGELA WEBB, in their individual capacity and TINA ABNEY, in their individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
S.A.P et al v. BARR et el
as 1:2019cv03549
Plaintiff:
S.A.P., C.J.M.E., J.S.R. and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM BARR, JAMES MCHENRY, CHAD WOLF and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Santos et al v. M.A.C. Grading Co. et al
as 7:2019cv00219
Defendant:
Christopher Hales, M.A.C. Grading Co. and Melissa D. Hales
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Sanjuan Gonzalez, R Santos Gonzales, Benjamin Sanjuan Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
