Cases 21 - 29 of 29
SPENCER et al v. ANCHOR PACKING CO., INC. et al
as 2:2010cv80896
Plaintiff:
CARL R. SPENCER and MARY SPENCER
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING CO., INC. , DURAMETALLIC CORP , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joe Wilson v. Jeremiah Leggs, et al
as 10-1999
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joe Wilson
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeremiah Leggs, Sheila F. Campbell, P.A. and The Honorable Mary Spencer McGowan
Leggs v. Wilson et al
as 4:2010cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Leggs
Defendant:
Joe Wilson and Does
Respondent:
Mary Spencer McGowan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title
Smiley v. Spencer et al
as 2:2009cv00552
Plaintiff:
Donald Leon Smiley
Defendant:
Vivian Marie Spencer, Ethel Smiley, Carolyn Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Strickland et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv04713
Plaintiff:
Ruth Strickland, Keyana Strickland, Lee Terrence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPENCER et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv67995
Plaintiff:
EARL LEROY SPENCER, SR., EARL LEROY SPENCER, SR., EARL LEROY SPENCER, SR. and others
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Spencer-Hoyle v Warden
as 4:2007cv02477
Petitioner:
Eva Marie Spencer-Hoyle
Respondent:
Warden, Federal Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SPENCER v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 3:2007cv00150
Plaintiff:
MARY SPENCER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
