Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Rivera v. USA
as 2:2013cv00394
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Martin Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rivera v. Hardy et al
as 1:2012cv09720
Plaintiff:
Martin Rivera
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, ADA Johnson, Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos-Padilla v. Molina-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2012cv01369
Plaintiff:
Yara Lee Santos-Padilla
Defendant:
Carlos Molina-Rodriguez, Conjugal Partnership Molina-Doe, Confesor Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anaya-Montiel et al v. Overlook Harvesting Company, LLC et al
as 8:2012cv00858
Plaintiff:
Francisco Anaya-Montiel , Israel Antonio-Ramirez , Juan Antonio-Rita and others
Defendant:
Overlook Harvesting Company, LLC and Bentley Brothers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Hugo Temaj-Agustin
as 11-6502
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HUGO TEMAJ-AGUSTIN, aka Agustine Hugo Temaj, aka Hugo Temaj-Agustine, aka Hugo Valerio Temaj-Agustine, aka Martin Rivera-Vargas
Best-Simpson v. Gosseen et al
as 1:2011cv08451
Plaintiff:
Courtney Jane Best-Simpson
Defendant:
Robert Gosseen, Gallagher, Gosseen & Faller, New York Organ Donor Network and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Heston Emergency Housing, LP et al v. Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs et al
as 4:2011cv01121
Plaintiff:
Heston Emergency Housing, LP and Naji Al-Fouzan
Defendant:
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, Michael Gerber, Martin Rivera Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera-Garcia v. United States of America
as 8:2010cv01958
Plaintiff:
Moises Martin Rivera-Garcia
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Martin Rivera-Gonzalez
as 10-50375
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARTIN RIVERA-GONZALEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
