Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Hart et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv17863
Plaintiff:
Mary Hart and Gerald Hart
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hart et al v. Boston Scientific Corp.
as MA/1:13-cv-11492
Plaintiff:
Mary Hart and Gerald Hart
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp.
Hart et al v. Boston Scientific Corp.
as 1:2013cv11492
Plaintiff:
Mary Hart and Gerald Hart
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hart et al v. Credit Bureau Associates
as 2:2012at01537
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hart , Mary Hart and Kenneth Hart
Defendant:
Credit Bureau Associates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hart et al v. Credit Bureau Associates
as 2:2012cv02906
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hart , Mary Hart and Kenneth Hart
Defendant:
Credit Bureau Associates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hart v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv06064
Plaintiff:
Mary Hart
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hart v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2012cv00089
Plaintiff:
Teena Marie Hart
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv08080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc., et al v. City of St. Louis, et al
as 10-1937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc., Sanctuary in the Ordinary and Jim Roos
Defendant - Appellee:
City of St. Louis and St. Louis Board of Adjustment
Defendant:
Shari Cunningham, George Hitt, Joe Klitzing and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
