Cases 21 - 30 of 797
Matias v. Kenda Rubber Industrial Co Ltd et al
as 2:2024cv07578
Defendant:
American Kenda Rubber Industrial Co Ltd d/b/a Kenda Tire and/or Kenda USA doing business as Kenda Tire doing business as Kenda USA, Parrish Tire Company, Kenda Rubber Industrial Co Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
Aura Matias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
US v. Matias-Fajardo
as 24-2089
Interested Party:
OWNERS OF EL HIPOPOTAMO RESTAURANT
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
BASILIO MATIAS-FAJARDO, a/k/a Sammy
Jhoan Ruano-Flautero, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-4015
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
ANGY MARCELA SUAREZ-YELA, JHOAN SEBASTIAN RUANO-FLAUTERO and JEYBIN MATIAS TORRES-SUAREZ
GEORGE v. MATIA MOBILITY, INC.
as 1:2024cv10520
Defendant:
MATIA MOBILITY, INC.
Plaintiff:
JAMES GEORGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv24509
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
MATIAS v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv10328
Plaintiff:
ROGER MATIAS
Defendant:
ABBOTT POINT OF CARE, INC., ABC COMPANIES 1-5, ALLISON SIRCHIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
USA v. Matias Cardosa, Jr.
as 24-13522
Defendant:
MATIAS SANCHES CARDOSA, JR.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Begher v. Costantini et al.
as 1:2024cv24060
Defendant:
mr. Juan Cruz Talia Brown, Jonathan Culley, Matias Costantini and others
Plaintiff:
Federico Christian Begher
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06990
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
