Cases 21 - 30 of 81
Wilson v. Arthur et al
as 3:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Vincent Wilson
Defendant:
Beth Arthur, Corizon Health and Mediko Correctional Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURCHISON v MEDIKO, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
MALIK H. MURCHISON
Defendant:
MEDIKO, INC. doing business as MEDIKO CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, HOWARD CARLTON, BSN RN, COLONEL DEREK T. ALMARODE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Eckard v. Rhodes et al
as 0:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Seth Eckard, Jr.
Defendant:
Marcus Rhodes, Phillip Thompson, Officer Sapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Wilson v. Quiroz et al
as 3:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Vincent Wilson
Defendant:
Sheriff Quiroz, Mediko Correctional Healthcare and E. Alpos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Arthur et al
as 3:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Vincent Wilson
Defendant:
Beth Arthur, Corizon Health and Mediko Correctional Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Arthur et al
as 3:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Vincent Wilson
Defendant:
Beth Arthur, Corizon Health and Mediko Correctional Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North v. Lawson et al
as 1:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. North
Defendant:
Beth Lawson, K. Krystanowicz, Dr. Garmen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Bailey v. Mediko, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
Randolph Bailey
Defendant:
Mediko, Inc. and Virat Bakhshi, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Foxx v. VBCC VB Sheriff et al
as 1:2022cv01188
Plaintiff:
Jeff Foxx
Defendant:
VBCC VB Sheriff, Deputy Eller and Mediko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kazimierczak v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2022cv03579
Plaintiff:
Cameron Kazimierczak
Defendant:
Marcus Rhodes, Phillip Thompson, J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
