Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv34953
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALPHONSO BROOKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv19236
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALAN BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Korey Aarstad, et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 20-35805
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SCOTT A. ALBERT, JOEL B. HEFTY, KENNETH L. DRAKE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation and JOHN SWING
Harris v. Sadler et al
as 2:2020cv00451
Defendant:
J. Sadler, Beth E. Cabell, S. Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan A. Harris, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99707
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Brooks, Sr. v. United States
as 20-2263
Petitioner:
Michael Williams Brooks, Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv49425
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hanson et al v. Larimer County et al
as 1:2020cv00317
Defendant:
Neil Baker, Stephen Wicker, Stephen (I) Wicker and others
Plaintiff:
Rosma Lynn Walker, Brett Alan Hanson and The Estate of Dorothy Evenlyn Felt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Konektive, LLC v. Response Media Group, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv02141
Defendant:
Michael A. Brooks and Response Media Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
Konektive, LLC.
Petitioner:
Esq Julio E Gil de Lamadrid
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
