Cases 21 - 30 of 68
United States of America et al v. Mims Management Group, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00318
Defendant:
Northeast Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Institutional Pharmacy Solutions, LLC, Mims Management Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama, United States of America, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Mims v. Melton et al
as 2:2019cv00296
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, John Hutton and Cordaro Melton
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Synovus Bank v. Institutional Pharmacy Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00926
Defendant:
Institutional Pharmacy Solutions, LLC, Mims Poperty Management Group, LLC, Mims Property Management Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Synovus Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00870
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lee v. Chilton County Board of Education et al
as 2:2018cv00806
Defendant:
Linda Hand, Pam Price, Keith Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Mims v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv08019
Plaintiff:
Ferlando Carmise Mims
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mims v. Melton et al
as 2:2018cv00645
Defendant:
Officer Melton, Leon Bolling, Corizon LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brannan v. West et al
as 1:2017cv00493
Plaintiff:
Marie Antoinette Brannan
Defendant:
James C. West , Bryan Mims , Billy O'Dell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv01642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
James v. Whitley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00568
Plaintiff:
Lamike A. James
Defendant:
Dominic Whitley, Bryant Mims, Thyeed Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
