Cases 21 - 30 of 133
Demetrius Glenn v. Adam Ruffin
as 23-6034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMETRIUS GLENN
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM RUFFIN, Attorney, MICHAEL HENTHORNE, Attorney, MS. WILLIAMS, Lt SCDC and others
Garner v. Kidd et al
as 1:2022cv06270
Plaintiff:
James Garner
Defendant:
Thomas Costello, City Of Chicago, Hashtag Vision, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Mickle v. O'Connell et al
as 1:2022cv02498
Plaintiff:
Marcus Mickle
Defendant:
O'Connell, Nash, Lair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Gates et al
as 4:2022cv00322
Plaintiff:
Kris Edward Bridges, II
Defendant:
Kevin Gates, White Boy, Billy Conn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammons v. Brown
as 5:2022cv00164
Petitioner:
Britt Jarriel Hammons
Respondent:
Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McDougald v. May et al
as 3:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
Jerone McDougald
Defendant:
Harold May, Mr. Walters, Major Mr. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ausby v. Rider et al
as 3:2022cv00715
Plaintiff:
Emerald M Ausby
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Rider, Major Rowland, Major Troyville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremiah Farmer v. BOP Director
as 22-6365
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMIAH S. FARMER
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS DIRECTOR, REGIONAL, WARDEN, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY HAZELTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01013
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Macho v. Patterson et al
as 4:2022cv00739
Plaintiff:
Shawn Macho
Defendant:
F Patterson and Mrs Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
