Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 21 - 30 of 163
Murray v. Department of the Army et al
as 5:2020hc02136
Respondent: Guybert J. Paul, Department of the Army, Ryan D. McCarthy and others
Petitioner: Clinton M. Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Murray v. Department of the Army et al
as 5:2020cv00386
Respondent: Guybert J. Paul, Department of the Army, Ryan D. McCarthy and others
Petitioner: Clinton M. Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Murray v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2020hc02114
Respondent: Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner: Jonathan David Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00302
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MINGO et al v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) et al
as 1:2020cv00226
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, ANDRE CHAMBERS, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) and others
Plaintiff: Jace Hyman, Jaden Hyman, W. DANIEL GRIST and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Corbett v. Hooks et al
as 5:2019ct03361
Defendant: Officer Holmes, Mr. Ballard, Sgt. Brounson and others
Plaintiff: Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Jacobs
as 5:2019hc02296
Respondent: Stephen Jacobs
Petitioner: Montey Andrea Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00568
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. EDGEN MURRAY CORPORATION
as 1:2019cv00936
Defendant: EDGEN MURRAY CORPORATION
Plaintiff: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aikens v. Putney et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00390
Plaintiff: Anthony M. Aikens
Defendant: Kerry Putney, Deborah Radisah, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?