Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 296
Shook v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00099
Plaintiff: Paul Edward Shook, Jr.
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ray et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00402
Plaintiff: Marcus Dewayne Scott, James Edward Ray, Timothy William Palivoda and others
Defendant: Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
(HC) Timberlake v. Martinez We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00118
Petitioner: Paul Edward Timberlake
Respondent: Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ray et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff: Marcus Dewayne Scott, James Edward Rayford, Timothy William Palivoda and others
Defendant: 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Shook v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00014
Plaintiff: Paul Edward Shook, Jr.
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Newland et al
as 4:2022cv00559
Plaintiff: Paul Edward Bell
Defendant: C Newland, M Gutierrez, Danon Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul DanielIn re: Paul Daniel
as 22-1906
Petitioner: In re: PAUL EDWARD DANIEL
Respondent: MELINDA K. BRAMAN
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13226
Plaintiff: PAUL EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DUTTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11722
Plaintiff: PAUL EDWARD DUTTON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lojewski v. Miniard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv11829
Petitioner: Paul Edward Lojewski
Respondent: Gary Miniard

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?