Cases 21 - 30 of 1,446
Celado v. Sorrell et al
as 9:2024cv00734
Defendant:
Trim, Getchy, Mr. M. Clean and others
Plaintiff:
Jeurin Celado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Board et al.
as 5:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
James William Hall
Defendant:
Anthony Board, Anthony Board, Jr., Todd McKenny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sparks (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv01373
Plaintiff:
Rustin Dean Sparks
Defendant:
Andre Stancil, Marshall Griffith, Ryan Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucius et al v Naphcare Inc.
as 1:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
Estate of Alizon Lopez and SHAWN LUCIUS
Defendant:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONES OF COUNTY OF MESA, COLORADO, Todd Rowell, Craig Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 198
Li v. Peck
as 24-1659
Plaintiff:
DONGMEI LI
Defendant:
RICHARD PECK, AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE INC, MACKENZIE D'LORIO and others
Peck v. Watsontown Trucking Company et al
as 3:2024cv01172
Counter Defendant:
Allison Peck
Counter Claimant:
Watsontown Trucking Company
Defendant:
David W. Sheatler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Peck v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Donald James Peck
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bernard Mims v. City of Chicago, et al
as 24-1564
Plaintiff:
BERNARD MIMS
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, KENNETH BOUDREAU, RICHARD PECK and others
Dove v. Martuscello et al
as 9:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Donald M. Dove
Defendant:
D.O.C.C.S., Daniel F. Martuscello, III, Greene Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rolon v. City of New York
as 24-1439
Plaintiff:
KAYLA ROLON, COREY GILZEAN, MICHAEL HERNANDEZ and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT, Mayor BILL DE BLASIO and others
Intervenor:
POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
