Cases 21 - 30 of 110
Perez v. Hanson et al
as 1:2021cv01520
Plaintiff:
Arturo Perez
Defendant:
Cicila Hanson and William Halbrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Hanson et al
as 1:2021cv01388
Plaintiff:
Arturo Perez
Defendant:
Cicila Hanson and William Halbrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Kijakazi (CONSENT)
as 1:2021cv00666
Plaintiff:
Pamela Perez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rivas et al v. PowerGrid Services LLC
as 4:2021cv00993
Plaintiff:
Emilio Gustavo Rivas and Richard Perez Rodriguez
Defendant:
PowerGrid Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manasco v. Best in Town et al
as 2:2021cv00381
Plaintiff:
Jordan Manasco, Brooke Blair, Katrina Perez and others
Defendant:
Gregory L Jackson, Graham G Jackson and Best In Town Inc d/b/a THE FURNACE, an Alabama Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Kelley et al v. Harrison et al
as 1:2021cv00056
Plaintiff:
Janet May and Randy Kelley
Defendant:
Christopher England, Democratic Party of the United States of America, State Democratic Executive Committee of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
Great American Assurance Company v. Vest et al
as 5:2021cv00020
Defendant:
David J. Vest and Perez Lacy
Plaintiff:
Great American Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castro et al v. Mata Electric LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01929
Defendant:
Tina Annette Sharpe, Erick Mata, Mata Construction LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Migdoel Perez, Cesar Castro, Wilfredo Ollarves and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sanic v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2020cv01013
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Rolando Perez Sanic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Perez v. Woods (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00779
Plaintiff:
Matthew Paul Perez
Defendant:
Walter Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
