Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Willis v. Taylor, Pigue, Marchetti & Blair, PLLC et al (JRG1)
as 2:2015cv00332
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Willis and Mary Willis
Defendant:
Taylor, Pigue, Marchetti, & Blair, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shelton v. Taylor, Pigue, Marchetti & Blair, PLLC (PLR1)
as 3:2015cv00501
Plaintiff:
Rachel A Shelton
Defendant:
Taylor, Pigue, Marchetti & Blair, PLLC and C & F Finance Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bromley et al v. TAYLOR, PIGUE, MARCHETTI & BLAIR, PLLC (TV2)
as 3:2015cv00453
Plaintiff:
Michael S Bromley and Susan P Bromley
Defendant:
TAYLOR, PIGUE, MARCHETTI & BLAIR, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pigues v. Solano County Jail et al
as 2:2015cv01005
Plaintiff:
Zavier Pigues
Defendant:
Solano County Jail and Aramark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pigues v. Solano County Jail et al
as 2:2015cv01004
Plaintiff:
Zavier Pigues
Defendant:
Solano County Jail, Sands, Pimentel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Fasciana et al
as 1:2013cv01791
Plaintiff:
Darrell Parks
Defendant:
Francis Fasciana, Kevin Pigus, Andrew Cioli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jerry Marloe Pigue v. A.c. And S. Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-82814
Plaintiff:
Jerry Marloe Pigue
Defendant:
A.c. And S. Inc
PIGUE et al v. A.C. AND S. INC. et al
as 2:2009cv82814
Defendant:
FEDERAL MOGUL PRODUCTS, INC., AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., WEIL MCLAIN COMPANY, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JERRY MARLOE PIGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDERSON et al v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2007cv66402
Defendant:
WEIL MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., FEDERAL MOGUL PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
WALTER EUGENE COLLATT, MARY BLAYLOCK, VERNELL BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Thomas, et al
as 07-60515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN THOMAS, LEPHER JENKINS, Warden, CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Commissioner and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
