Cases 21 - 30 of 1,772
Mueller v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00590
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MUELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gifford v. Estate of George Bush et al
as 2:2020mc51555
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Estate of George Bush, Robert Mueller and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander R. Gifford
Christopher Johnson v. Arthur Sibley, et al
as 20-2922
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE RABENSTEINE, ARTHUR SIBLEY, ROBERT STRADLING and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER M. JOHNSON
(PS) Wade v. Kerner et al
as 2:2020cv01791
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Defendant:
Henry J. Kerner and Robert Mueller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tinker v. Johnson et al
as 8:2020cv02390
Defendant:
James Simons, Joseph Biden, Dawn Tinker and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela R Tinker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Tavaris E. Hunt v. Jason Garnett
as 20-2562
Petitioner / Appellant:
TAVARIS E. HUNT
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT MUELLER and JASON GARNETT, Chief of Parole for the Illinois Department of Corrections
POHLE v. PENCE et al
as 4:2020cv00139
Defendant:
JOHN G ROBERTS, JOE BIDEN, JOHN BRENNAN and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. POHLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUELLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv02884
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MUELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Van Allen v. Mueller et al
as 3:2020cv00305
Plaintiff:
Harold William Van Allen
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Judges from the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Chief Justice of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Blixseth v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2020cv00265
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, John Morton and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Blixseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
