Cases 21 - 30 of 1,207
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Rodriguez Then v. US
as 24-1120
Petitioner:
LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUE THEN and LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ THEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Rodrigues, et al. v. General Motors LLC
as 24-1945
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE RODRIGUES and CHARLES SMITH
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rodrigues De Freitas v. The Hertz Corporation
as 24-1713
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ALBERTO RODRIGUES DE FREITAS, as Administrator of the Estate of Isabel Auler (deceased)
Defendant:
THE HERTZ CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
RODRIGUES v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02187
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
CAROL RODRIGUES
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RODRIGUES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00369
Petitioner:
TINA RODRIGUES
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Rodrigues v. Transdev U.S., Inc.
as 2:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Samuel Rodrigues
Defendant:
Transdev U.S., Inc. Doing business as Transdev Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Hickman v. New York County Defender Services et al
as 1:2024cv01755
Plaintiff:
Quandell Hickman
Defendant:
New York County Defender Services, The City of New York, Eric Burse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
