Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01023
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pringle v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00395
Petitioner: Roger Pringle
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00955
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00901
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Pringle v. Sevier We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00050
Petitioner: Roger Pringle
Respondent: Mark Sevier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PRINGLE v. SEVIER
as 2:2017cv00561
Petitioner: ROGER PRINGLE
Respondent: MARK R. SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pringle v. Government Office of Cuyahoga County Ohio Prosecution et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02425
Plaintiff: Roger Pringle
Defendant: Government Office of Cuyahoga County Ohio Prosecution and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRINGLE v. NASH et al
as 1:2017cv04148
Defendant: BARTHOLOMEW INDIANA, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA, WILLIAM M. NASH and others
Plaintiff: ROGER PRINGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINGLE v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv03530
Petitioner: ROGER PRINGLE
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PRINGLE v. ZOELLER et al
as 1:2017cv02949
Defendant: KELLY S. BENJAMIN, WILLIAM M. NASH, LYNDA K. ROBISON and others
Plaintiff: ROGER PRINGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?