Cases 21 - 30 of 213
Taylor v. Rollie Transport Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
James Gravis Taylor and James Garvis Taylor, II
Defendant:
Rollie Transport, Inc., Amtrust Insurance Company, Victor Manuel Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv03128
Petitioner:
ROLLIE MONTEZ MITCHELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ROLLIE v. RIVELLO
as 2:2021cv05665
Petitioner:
OMAR ROLLIE
Respondent:
JOHN A. RIVELLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter et al v. Rollie Transport Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv01382
Plaintiff:
Victor Carter and Tracy Sarter
Defendant:
Rollie Transport Inc. and Roleadis Saiz Villavicencio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Ventura v. RKB Above, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05830
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ventura
Defendant:
RKB Above, Inc. doing business as Rolly Kimbab, James Kang and Jung Hyun Kang
Ventura v. RKB Above, Inc. et. al.
as 1:2021cv05830
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ventura
Defendant:
RKB Above, Inc. doing business as Rolly Kimbab, James Kang and Jung Hyun Kang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
FLY v. ROTH et al
as 1:2021cv09696
Plaintiff:
TONI FLY and WILLIAM ANTHONY FLY
Defendant:
JAY FERGUSON, DANIEL L HOVCAND, M SEGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lott v. The United States Of America
as 4:2021cv01090
Respondent:
The United States Of America
Petitioner:
Rollie A. Lott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hebron et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2021cv00405
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
Imelda Umali Hebron, Emmanuel Rolly Misola Hebron and Emmanuel Rodli Umali Hebron
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
