Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Tanyhill v. Pope et al
as 2:2013cv01277
Plaintiff:
Lashonna R. Tanyhill
Defendant:
Gregory S. Pope, Pope Law Offices, LLC and Winona Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Charles Pope v. Oregon Board of Parole and Po
as 13-36018
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES S. POPE
Respondent - Appellee:
OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST PRISON SUPERVISION
Pope et al v. Sunrise Senior Living, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01441
Plaintiff:
James S. Pope and John F. Gaul
Defendant:
Sunrise Senior Living, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pope v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2012cv06960
Plaintiff:
Michelle S. Pope
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pope v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
as 2:2012cv00305
Respondent:
Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Petitioner:
Charles S. Pope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pope v. State Of Florida et al
as 8:2011cv02326
Petitioner:
Ryan S. Pope
Respondent:
State Of Florida and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pope v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00449
Plaintiff:
Latoya S. Pope
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , Organon Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. , Organon International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pope v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
Latoya S. Pope
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , Organon Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. , Organon International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pope v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00632
Defendant:
John Doe, J. Gilmore, A. Hannon and others
Plaintiff:
Charles S. Pope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
