Cases 21 - 30 of 5,893
Masons Supply Company v. Freeman et al
as 2:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Masons Supply Company
Defendant:
Salmon Bay Sand & Gravel Company and fred freeman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sand v. Humboldt County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00872
Plaintiff:
Dennis Keith Sand
Defendant:
Humboldt County Correctional Facility, Sanchez, Sintic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miskey v. New York Community Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Dale Miskey
Defendant:
New York Community Bancorp, Inc., Thomas Robert Cangemi and John J. Pinto
Petitioner:
Boston Retirement System and Sand Hollow Management, LLC
Jerry Caldwell v. David LeMaster, et al
as 24-5118
Plaintiff:
JERRY CALDWELL
Defendant:
DAVID LEMASTER, Warden, GARY CHANEY, RN, NP J. MUSIC and others
Sands v. Sands
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Lamar Sands
Defendant:
Bernadette Sands
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talavera et al v. The First Liberty Insurance Corporation
as 6:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Alice Talavera and Hubert Talavera
Defendant:
First Liberty Insurance Corporation (The) and The First Liberty Insurance Corporation
Other:
Kimberly Sands
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Borton v. Matteucci et al
as 6:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Michael Borton
Defendant:
Delores Matteucci, Oregon Health Authority, Oregon State Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Bowers et al
as 4:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Berry Raydell Freeman
Defendant:
Rodger E. Bowers, Dustin T Wanders, Christopher N. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irvin v. Google.com et al
as 0:2024cv60145
Plaintiff:
Matthew Irvin
Defendant:
Google.com, YouTube.com, Alexis Bynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
