Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Alan Metzgar v. KBR, Inc.
as 17-1960
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KBR, INCORPORATED, Burn Pit Litigation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744, PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744, JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748 and others
Alan Metzgar v. KBR, Inc.
as 17-1960
:
In re: KBR, INCORPORATED, Burn Pit Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744, PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744, JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KBR, INCORPORATED, KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT, LLC, HALLIBURTON COMPANY and others
Defendant:
ERKA LTD
Echols v. Witherspoon et al
as 3:2016cv03228
Plaintiff:
Sean Alexander Echols
Defendant:
Kenneth Witherspoon and Stacey Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Sean Hayne
as 16-4514
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SEAN ALEXANDER HAYNES
Echols v. Witherspoon et al
as 3:2016cv02732
Plaintiff:
Sean Alexander Echols
Defendant:
Kenneth Witherspoon and Stacey Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv11193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hold v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2013cv05814
Plaintiff:
Sean Alexander Hold
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Department, Greg Suhr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander et al v. Unitex Textile Rental Services, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00856
Plaintiff:
Colleen Kelly Alexander and Sean Alexander
Defendant:
Unitex Textile Rental Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
