Cases 21 - 30 of 377
Fagan v. Apt Group LTD et al
as 9:2023cv81499
Plaintiff:
Edward D. Fagan
Defendant:
Apt Group LTD, Gerard Joseph, Ria Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE v. P1 GROUP, INC. et al.
as 1:2023cv00989
Defendant:
CLARIOS, LLC, P1 GROUP, INC., RUDOLPH/ LIBBE, INC and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
SULLIVAN v. NICHOLS et al
as 2:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E SULLIVAN, II
Defendant:
HARVEY NICHOLS, WIPO and SIR DICKSON POON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Core Capital Partners, Ltd. v. Credit Suisse Group AG et al
as 1:2023cv09287
Plaintiff:
Core Capital Partners, Ltd.
Defendant:
Credit Suisse Group AG, Axel P. Lehmann, Ulrich Korner and others
Moore v. Henderson et al
as 4:2023cv05142
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J Moore
Defendant:
Richard L Henderson, MD, Timothy G Caudill, MD, Sir Reyes, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEMBHARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv18399
Plaintiff:
SIR NEMBHARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ngare v. State of Georgia
as 1:2023cv04465
Plaintiff:
Sir Chuku Maurice Oloo Ngare
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAGO v. MERCER et al
as 2:2023cv20749
Plaintiff:
AL RAGO
Defendant:
DARREN MERCER, HAO (KEVIN) CHEN, DOZY MMOBUOSI and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02202
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
RIVERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02726
Plaintiff:
SIR RICH RIVERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
