Cases 21 - 30 of 215
Gervat v. Dorsey et al
as 1:2023cv00413
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Jack Dorsey, Amrita Ahuja, Roelof Botha and others
Nominal Defendant:
Block, Inc. and Square, Inc.
Cruse et al v. Block, Inc.
as 3:2022cv06401
Defendant:
Block, Inc. and Square Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dale Cruse, Jernej Furman, Alex Proimos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Lambert v. City Square Inc
as 3:2022cv01885
Plaintiff:
Benito Lambert
Defendant:
City Square Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kim Cramton, et al v. Eat Clean Operations LLC, et al
as 22-15948
Plaintiff:
KIM CRAMTON
Defendant / Appellant:
EAT CLEAN OPERATIONS LLC and KEELY NEWMAN
Defendant:
GRABBAGREEN FRANCHISING LLC and EAT CLEAN HOLDINGS LLC
Counter Defendant:
LAURA MCCORMACK
Not Yet Classified:
GULF GIRL SQUARED, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
KIELB v. PRO TAE KWON DO OF TOWER SQUARE INC et al
as 1:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
JACKSON KIELB
Defendant:
PRO TAE KWON DO OF TOWER SQUARE, INC., ERIK J. MAGBANUA, PRO TAE KWON DO OF TOWER SQUARE INC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Thorne v. Square, Inc.
as 22-542
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Deeann Thorne, Demetrius Lovett, Robin Clements and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Square, Inc. and Sutton Bank
Cruse et al v. Block, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00783
Defendant:
Block, Inc. and Square, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dale Cruse, Jernej Furman, Alex Proimos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
