Cases 21 - 30 of 122
Williams v. ESP et al
as 3:2022cv00416
Petitioner:
Terrance E. Williams
Respondent:
ESP, T Cooke and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Durand v. Muaro
as 3:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Roberto Durand
Defendant:
Muaro and Asst Warden T Cooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatt-Lipscomb v. Bayside Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv00963
Plaintiff:
Peter Hatt-Lipscomb
Defendant:
Bayside Orthopaedics, Inc., Matthew N Brower, Ronald T. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cook v. Cohen et al
as 0:2022cv01515
Plaintiff:
Darry T. Cook and Darryl T. Cook
Defendant:
Levern Cohen, Consonya Washington and SCDC Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Roberto Durand v. T. Cooke
as 22-15774
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
T. COOKE, Mrs.
Castillo et al v. T Cook Trucking, LLC
as 2:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Rafael Ramirez Castillo, Maria Santos Almanza Castillo and Alma Espindola
Defendant:
T Cook Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Durand v. Cooke
as 3:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Roberto Durand
Defendant:
Mrs. T Cooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Bayside Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv02678
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Reid
Defendant:
Bayside Orthopaedics, Inc., Matthew N. Brower, Ronald T. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cooke v. Kenny et al
as 3:2021cv01244
Plaintiff:
Ian T. Cooke
Defendant:
Thomas Kenny, Robert Major and Bonnie Hakins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv56032
Plaintiff:
BRIAN T COOK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
