Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01665
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Harman v. Trinity Industries, Inc., et al
as 15-40337
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSHUA HARMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED and TRINITY HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, L.L.C.
Appellant:
TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM and TEXAS A & M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Massachusetts Retirement Systems et al v. Rickard et al
as 4:2014mc02610
Movant:
City of Brockton Retirement System, Norfolk County Retirement System, Plymouth County Retirement System and others
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Retirement Systems and Richard Medoff
Defendant:
David Rickard, Thomas M Ryan and CVS Caremark Corporation
United States of America ex rel. Joshua Harman v. Trinity Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2013mc00006
Plaintiff:
United States of America (ex rel Joshua Harman)
Defendant:
Trinity Industries Inc and Trinity Highway Products, LLC
Movant:
Texas A&M University System
Cause Of Action: M:08-85q
United States of America ex rel. Joshua Harman v. Trinity Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2013mc00349
Plaintiff:
United States of America ex rel. Joshua Harman
Defendant:
Trinity Industries, Inc. and Trinity Highway Products, LLC
Movant:
Texas A&M University System
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Quash
Trinity Industries, Inc. et al v. Harman
as 1:2013mc00012
Plaintiff:
Trinity Industries, Inc. and The Texas A&M University System
Defendant:
Joshua Harman
The Texas A&M University System et al v. Liu et al
as 3:2013cv00085
Plaintiff:
The Texas A&M University System and Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station
Defendant:
Mingsheng Liu and Building Energy Solutions & Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Trinity Industries, Inc. v. SPIG Industry, LLC
as 3:2012mc00094
Plaintiff:
Trinity Industries, Inc. and Texas A&M University System
Defendant:
SPIG Industry, LLC, SPIG Industry, Inc. and SELCO Construction Services, Inc.
Movant:
Highway Safety Corp.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
MULAWKA v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv01651
Plaintiff:
MARZENA MULAWKA
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MERCER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
