Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 49
de Ratafia et al v. The County of Columbia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00174
Plaintiff: Georges-Lucien de Ratafia and Diane Ackroyd
Defendant: The County of Columbia , David W. Harrison, Jr. , David Proper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In the Estate of Marguarite Wisniewski et al v. District Attorney et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00662
Plaintiff: In the Estate of Marguarite Wisniewski and Saly Ann Wisniewski
Defendant: District Attorney and County of Columbia Wi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
de Ratafia et al v. The County of Columbia et al
as 1:2012cv05457
Plaintiff: Georges-Lucien de Ratafia and Diane Ackroyd
Defendant: The County of Columbia , David W. Harrison, Jr. , David Proper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 12-1067
Plaintiff - Appellee: SHIRLEY GELLER, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA, TWIN CITIES BAKERY WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
: COUNTY OF ORANGE, ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, M. JOYCE HOWE and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF VA, LARRY YOUNG and THERESE SHEPLEY
Movant - Appellant: CORINNA CONNICK
Defendant - Appellee: BAXTER PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., STANLEY C. HOPKINS, MONSANTO COMPANY and others
Defendant: AGOURON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BIOGEN, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC and others
Interested Party - Appellee: COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE POLICY AND FINANCING, HUMANA, INC., CARDINAL HEALTH, INC. and others
Interested Party: MILBERG LLP, PARMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY and others
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 10-1959
: SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 537 TRUST FUNDS, BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS and SHEET METAL WORKERS UNION NATIONAL HEALTH FUND
Defendant - Appellant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee: GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
Appellant: DONALD E. HAVILAND, JR.
LaRoche et al v. Pennsylvania State Police et al
as 4:2010cv01306
Plaintiff: Ronald R LaRoche and Benita D LaRoche
Defendant: Pennsylvania State Police, County of Columbia, Michael Kozma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forjone v. The State of California
as 10-822
Plaintiff: Wayne Mack, Dan DelPlato, Jr., Gabriel Razzano and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: John-Joseph Forjone, the 42 USC 1983/Bivens/False Claims Act matter effecting the statewide distribution of HAVA funds requiring a 28 USC 2284 panel effecting New York Municipal People's equity in Bottom-up suffrage. Homerule autonomy and effecting real p
Defendant - Appellee: The State of California, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of Oregon, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of New Mexico, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively and others
Dedrick et al v. Sheriff of Columbia County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00590
Plaintiff: Harold F. Dedrick, Sr. and Marion Dedrick
Defendant: Sheriff of Columbia County, Sheriff David W. Harrison, Jr., Deputy Brian Molinski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Dedrick et al v. Sheriff of Columbia County et al
as 1:2009cv00374
Plaintiff: Harold F. Dedrick, Sr. and Marion Dedrick
Defendant: Sheriff of Columbia County, David W. Harrison, Jr., Brian Molinski and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Langdon et al v. Columbia et al
as 1:2009mc00037
Plaintiff: Frank Langdon and Grant D. Langdon
Defendant: County of Columbia, Paul Proper, David Proper and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?