Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Darious Moore v. State of South Carolina We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-7462
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARIOUS LAMONT MOORE
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT, in the County of Columbia and COURT OF APPEALS, in the County of Sumter
Langdon et al v. The County of Columbia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00842
Plaintiff: Frank Dinehart Langdon and Grant Dinehart Langdon
Defendant: The County of Columbia , Paul Proper, Jr. , Carl Whitbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
de Ratafia et al v. The County of Columbia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00174
Plaintiff: Georges-Lucien de Ratafia and Diane Ackroyd
Defendant: The County of Columbia , David W. Harrison, Jr. , David Proper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In the Estate of Marguarite Wisniewski et al v. District Attorney et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00662
Plaintiff: In the Estate of Marguarite Wisniewski and Saly Ann Wisniewski
Defendant: District Attorney and County of Columbia Wi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
de Ratafia et al v. The County of Columbia et al
as 1:2012cv05457
Plaintiff: Georges-Lucien de Ratafia and Diane Ackroyd
Defendant: The County of Columbia , David W. Harrison, Jr. , David Proper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 12-1067
Plaintiff - Appellee: SHIRLEY GELLER, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA, TWIN CITIES BAKERY WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
: COUNTY OF ORANGE, ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, M. JOYCE HOWE and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF VA, LARRY YOUNG and THERESE SHEPLEY
Movant - Appellant: CORINNA CONNICK
Defendant - Appellee: BAXTER PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., STANLEY C. HOPKINS, MONSANTO COMPANY and others
Defendant: AGOURON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BIOGEN, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC and others
Interested Party - Appellee: COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE POLICY AND FINANCING, HUMANA, INC., CARDINAL HEALTH, INC. and others
Interested Party: MILBERG LLP, PARMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY and others
In re: Pharmaceutical, et al
as 08-1055
Not Classified By Court: SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 537 TRUST FUNDS, BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS and SHEET METAL WORKERS UNION NATIONAL HEALTH FUND
Defendant / Appellant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee: GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
In Re: Pharmaceutica, et al, et al
as 08-8001
Not Classified By Court: SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Petitioner: DONALD E. HAVILAND, JR., LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY and others
Respondent: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, JOHNSON & JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, APOTHECON, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee: GLAXOSMITHKLINE and GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
In Re: Pharmaceutical
as 08-1190
Not Classified By Court: SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: HAROLD BEAN, LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY and others
Young, et al v. Bristol Myers Squibb Bristol-M, et al
as 08-1002
Not Classified By Court: SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: THERESE SHEPLEY and LARRY YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, WARRICK PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?