Cases 21 - 30 of 4,238
Edgar Holloway v. Kirsten Hunter, et al
as 24-2069
Plaintiff:
Edgar Holloway
Defendant:
Kirsten Hunter, Sharron Robbins, Preston Morgan and others
Groves v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02788
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Groves
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones et al v. Nielsen et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Kalie Jones and Nicholas Stephen Hulse
Defendant:
Judge Douglas Nielsen, Moody John R., Cleave Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taie, et al. v. Ten Bridges LLC, et al.
as 24-3243
Plaintiff:
MARY TAIE, an individual, MOYRA COOP, an individual and WILLIAM GROVES, an individual, on behalf of themselves and as representatives of similarly situated persons
Defendant:
TEN BRIDGES LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company and DEMIAN HEALD, an individual; and the marital community comprised of Demian Heald and Doe Heald
Groves v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01473
Plaintiff:
Mary Groves
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Urmancheev v. Ndoh, et al.
as 24-3043
Plaintiff:
ALIM S. URMANCHEEV
Defendant:
R. NDOH, P. VERA, D GROVES and others
Tierno v. PA Parole Board et al
as 3:2024cv00790
Petitioner:
William Tierno
Respondent:
PA Parole Board, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Warden of SCI-Pine Grove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weigand v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03619
Plaintiff:
John Weigand
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., CVS 2788 Buffalo Groe, L.L.C. and Buffalo Grove CVS, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
