Cases 21 - 30 of 70
BMO Harris Bank NA v. Jamco LTD et al
as 5:2020cv00906
Defendant:
Joe Madore and Jamco LTD
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez-Brooks et al v. Easter et al
as 3:2020cv00569
Petitioner:
Rejeanne collier, Dianthe Martinez-Brooks, Kenneth Cassidy and others
Respondent:
D. Easter and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MADORE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv63944
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MADORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OPHEIM et al v. VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT et al
as 2:2020cv02483
Defendant:
AUDI OF AMERICA, INC., AUDI AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MILLS, MELISSA GALLO, CARL POPOLO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. MOGAN et al
as 2:2019cv19167
Defendant:
OFC. DRAGONE, OFC. MADORE, OFC. SILVERSTER and others
Plaintiff:
ALAN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GURHAN v. CITY OF SACO et al
as 2:2019cv00349
Plaintiff:
KHALID GURHAN
Defendant:
CITY OF SACO, DETECTIVE RYAN HATCH, CITY OF BIDDEFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Viprino v. Town of Harwich et al
as 1:2019cv11077
Defendant:
Ed McManus, David Guillemette, Christopher Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Dino Viprino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stile v. Somerset County, et al
as 19-1220
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS GARNETT, Corrections Officer, KEITH PLOURD, Corrections Officer, TRACY MARTIN, Corrections Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES STILE
Defendant:
MAINE STATE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF MAINE and WAYNE KLINE, Deputy Sheriff
Durwyn Talley v. Mary Miller, et al
as 17-2789
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DURWYN TALLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY MILLER, Health Care Administrator, CHRISTOPHER L. GORE, CHARLES CAMPBELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
